{"id":12016,"date":"2026-03-04T01:07:41","date_gmt":"2026-03-04T06:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/?p=12016"},"modified":"2026-03-04T01:07:41","modified_gmt":"2026-03-04T06:07:41","slug":"singapore-disposable-carrier-bag-charge-cuts-plastic-bag-use-by-up-to-80","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/?p=12016","title":{"rendered":"Singapore disposable carrier bag charge cuts plastic bag use by up to 80%"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n \n <\/picture>
Although the policy has reduced single-use plastic consumption, debate continues over how supermarkets use the proceeds and whether clearer rules are needed. \/ Credit: Shutterstock AI<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Singapore\u2019s mandatory disposable carrier bag charge introduced in July 2023 has significantly reduced supermarket plastic bag use, while recent discussions focus on how collected funds are being allocated.<\/p>\n

The initiative, overseen by the National Environment Agency (NEA), aims to cut plastic waste and encourage sustainable consumption.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n

Discover B2B Marketing That Performs <\/h4>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tCombine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n


\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFind out more <\/svg><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n

Decline in bag use at major supermarkets<\/h2>\n

Under the policy, supermarket operators with annual turnover above S$100 million must charge at least 5\u00a2 for every disposable carrier bag<\/em> provided at physical store checkout counters. This applies regardless of material, covering about two-thirds of licensed supermarket outlets in Singapore.<\/p>\n

Government data shows that since implementation, participating supermarkets reported a 70\u201380 % drop in the number of disposable carrier bags issued in the first year, indicating a notable decline in consumption.<\/p>\n

This result aligns with similar bag charge schemes overseas, where price signals have reduced plastic bag use.<\/p>\n

The charge does not apply to online purchases of groceries, although reusable packing remains an option for in-store collection and delivery packaging. Supermarkets are required to publish annual data on bag numbers issued and proceeds collected.<\/p>\n

Use of proceeds under review<\/h2>\n

The policy was structured primarily as a behavioural tool to reduce disposable carrier bag<\/em> use. Supermarket operators are \u201cstrongly encouraged\u201d to channel collected proceeds to environmental or social causes. However, this is not a statutory requirement.<\/p>\n

Environmental advocates and public commentary in early 2026 have raised concerns about how proceeds are spent. Some retailers reported using significant portions of funds on internal operations \u2014 such as energy-efficient refrigeration upgrades and trial projects \u2014 rather than external environmental programmes.<\/p>\n

This has prompted questions about whether the original public expectations for proceeds align with actual corporate practices.<\/p>\n

Supermarket groups argue that certain expenditures contribute indirectly to sustainability goals. Meanwhile, the requirement to disclose usage data aims to maintain transparency and allow public and regulatory review.<\/p>\n

Policy context and environmental goals<\/h2>\n

The disposable carrier bag charge forms part of a broader set of waste-management measures in Singapore\u2019s Zero Waste Masterplan and the Singapore Green Plan 2030, intended to reduce packaging waste and greenhouse gas emissions from disposables.<\/p>\n

Public consultations prior to implementation showed support for a per-bag charge model as an effective deterrent against unnecessary bag use.<\/p>\n

The NEA\u2019s approach reflects global trends in plastic waste reduction policies, where modest levies on single-use plastics influence consumer behaviour more than outright bans.<\/p>\n

Singapore continues to monitor the charge\u2019s effectiveness and may review aspects of the scheme based on environmental outcomes and stakeholder feedback.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n