{"id":7522,"date":"2025-06-05T20:32:06","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T00:32:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/?p=7522"},"modified":"2025-06-05T20:32:06","modified_gmt":"2025-06-06T00:32:06","slug":"california-plastic-packaging-bill-sparks-backlash","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/?p=7522","title":{"rendered":"California plastic packaging bill sparks backlash"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"article-image\">\n<figure class=\"article-image__container\">\n                                    <picture><source media=\"(min-width: 990px)\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.packaging-gateway.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/16\/2025\/06\/Waste-770x433.jpg\"\/><source media=\"(min-width: 430px)\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.packaging-gateway.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/16\/2025\/06\/Waste-940x528.jpg\"\/>\n                                    <\/picture><figcaption class=\"c-featured-image__description\">The Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act passed the state Senate but now faces strong resistance as it heads to the Assembly. \/ Credit: Robert V Schwemmer via Shutterstock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p class=\"drop-cap\">A controversial bill aimed at cutting plastic waste in California is encountering significant resistance, even after clearing the state Senate for a second time.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act<\/em>\u2014seen by advocates as a bold step toward sustainable packaging\u2014passed the Senate last week with a narrow 33\u201325 vote.<\/p>\n<p>With the legislative session due to end next week, it remains unclear whether the bill will survive the state Assembly.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed law would mandate a 30% reduction in plastic packaging over the next 12 years and establish an extended producer responsibility (EPR) scheme, requiring companies to pay for waste collection, recycling infrastructure, and municipal support.<\/p>\n<p>While backers argue it could reduce plastic pollution and recycling costs, critics say the plan risks driving up prices and burdens manufacturers.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-concerns-over-cost-and-industry-impact\">Concerns over cost and industry impact<\/h2>\n<p>Senator George Borrello (R-Sunset Bay) has voiced strong objections, warning that the costs of compliance will be passed on to consumers.<\/p>\n<p>He questioned how backers could accurately predict savings, citing uncertainties in packaging redesign, particularly in the food sector, where safety standards must be met.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat I fail to understand is, how do they have a crystal ball to explain how we\u2019re going to solve the packaging problems that are created?\u201d Borrello said during Senate debate. He raised doubts about the feasibility of custom packaging for California and the bill\u2019s economic impact.<\/p>\n<p>Senator Pam Helming joined Borrello in pressing why large firms like Heinz oppose the legislation if they are already near compliance. The company reportedly meets 87% of the proposed standards.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-exemptions-and-enforcement-mechanisms-debated\">Exemptions and enforcement mechanisms debated<\/h2>\n<p>Supporters of the bill, including Senator Pete Harckham (D-Peekskill), chair of the Senate Environmental Conservation Committee, insist the law includes reasonable flexibility.<\/p>\n<p>He pointed to \u201coff-ramps\u201d allowing waivers for companies that prove compliance would be technologically or financially unfeasible.<\/p>\n<p>However, Harckham said many companies requested blanket exemptions, which lawmakers declined to provide.<\/p>\n<p>The bill targets large producers\u2014those with over $1 million in annual revenue\u2014tasking them with reducing waste, supporting recycling efforts, and eliminating toxic substances in packaging materials.<\/p>\n<p>A newly created Recycling Inspector General role would oversee enforcement and transparency. The state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) would also receive funding from producer fees to manage oversight and programme delivery.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-push-for-environmental-reform-amid-low-recycling-rates\">Push for environmental reform amid low recycling rates<\/h2>\n<p>Harckham defended the bill\u2019s urgency, citing low national recycling rates\u2014estimated at just 5% to 6% in 2021\u2014and rising costs to local governments struggling with waste management.<\/p>\n<p>He argued the current system is not keeping pace with the volume of packaging waste being generated, especially from single-use plastics.<\/p>\n<p>Proponents of the packaging reform bill view it as part of a growing trend in environmental legislation. Similar EPR laws have been enacted in Maine, Oregon, Colorado and other states.<\/p>\n<p>Several European countries have also implemented plastic reduction targets, though Borrello argued California\u2019s proposal is more aggressive and potentially costlier.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the bill\u2019s provisions for gradual implementation and industry waivers, it continues to face scepticism from lawmakers and stakeholders worried about economic fallout.<\/p>\n<p>Whether the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act becomes law now depends on its fate in the state Assembly\u2014an outcome expected within days.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Newsletter banner start --><\/p>\n<p><!-- <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"\"> --><\/p>\n<div class=\"grid-container\">\n<section class=\"gdm-newsletter-banner__container\">\n<div class=\"grid-x gdm-newsletter-banner__wrapper-container gdm-newsletter-banner__wrapper-container--article\">\n<div class=\"cell large-9 gdm-newsletter-banner-info__wrapper\">\n<div class=\"gdm-newsletter-banner-logo__container\">\n                    <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.packaging-gateway.com\/wp-content\/themes\/goodlife-wp-B2B\/assets\/images\/newsletter-new.svg\" alt=\"Email newsletter icon\"\/>\n                <\/div>\n<p><h3 class=\"gdm-newsletter-banner__heading wp-noreslt\">Sign up for our daily news round-up!<\/h3>\n<h3 class=\"gdm-newsletter-banner__sub-heading\">Give your business an edge with our leading industry insights.<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- Newsletter banner end --><\/p>\n<footer class=\"article-footer\">\n                                <!-- article-actions start --><\/p>\n<p><!-- .gdm-article-actions -->                                <!-- article-actions end --><br \/>\n                            <\/footer>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.packaging-gateway.com\/news\/california-plastic-packaging-bill-sparks-backlash\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act passed the state Senate but now faces strong resistance as it heads to the Assembly. \/ Credit: Robert V Schwemmer via Shutterstock A controversial bill aimed at cutting plastic waste in California is encountering significant resistance, even after clearing the state Senate for a second time. The Packaging [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":7523,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[165],"tags":[2363],"class_list":["post-7522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-packaging-news","tag-california-plastic-packaging-bill-sparks-backlash"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7522\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7523"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}