{"id":8945,"date":"2025-08-26T23:34:00","date_gmt":"2025-08-27T03:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/?p=8945"},"modified":"2025-08-26T23:34:00","modified_gmt":"2025-08-27T03:34:00","slug":"the-best-and-worst-redesigned-cracker-barrel-logos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/?p=8945","title":{"rendered":"The Best (and Worst) Redesigned Cracker Barrel Logos"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<br \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The entire conversation around the Cracker Barrel redesign is exhausting.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s also hilarious in a lot of ways, too, but mostly just exhausting, and I have heard every manner of excuse and talking point for why it does or doesn\u2019t suck. How a perfectly fine redesign that is neither great nor terrible has become a cultural lightning rod with\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2025\/08\/25\/business\/cracker-barrel-new-logo-could-have-done-better\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">IRL market implications<\/a>\u00a0is genuinely silly to me. The breaking redesign news pile-on is fun when the social media machine first gets its hands on it, but boy howdy, it\u2019s not fun at all right now.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>One thing\u2019s for sure: I have never spent this much time thinking about Cracker Barrel.<\/p>\n<p><button id=\"expand-paywall-button\" class=\"expand-paywall-button\">Subscribe to Read More<\/button><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/thedieline.com\/the-best-and-worst-redesigned-cracker-barrel-logos\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The entire conversation around the Cracker Barrel redesign is exhausting.\u00a0 It\u2019s also hilarious in a lot of ways, too, but mostly just exhausting, and I have heard every manner of excuse and talking point for why it does or doesn\u2019t suck. How a perfectly fine redesign that is neither great nor terrible has become a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":8946,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[165],"tags":[2576,515,86],"class_list":["post-8945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-packaging-news","tag-cracker-barrel","tag-logo","tag-redesign"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8945\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8946"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.packagingindustrynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}